On April 30, 2026, Harbhajan Singh, a prominent Member of Parliament, found himself embroiled in controversy when authorities withdrew his security cover. This decision sparked immediate backlash as it coincided with an attack on his residence in Jalandhar.
Just days earlier, on April 25, the Punjab government issued an order that removed Singh’s protection without any new threat assessment or prior notice. His security had been reinstated after a review by state intelligence agencies in May 2022 due to safety concerns.
In response to the abrupt withdrawal, Singh filed a petition challenging the decision. On April 28, he submitted a representation requesting the restoration of his security. However, officials have yet to act on this request.
The situation escalated rapidly. Following the removal of his security cover, a crowd allegedly attacked his home shortly after. The Punjab Advocate General remarked, “Harbhajan Singh is not residing in Punjab,” which raised questions about the motives behind the security withdrawal.
Singh claims that the decision was politically motivated—coming at a time when he had just decided to leave the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). Observers note that this timing is suspicious and may indicate underlying political tensions.
The Ministry of Home Affairs intervened post-attack by deploying CRPF personnel for Singh’s protection. The urgency of this action underscored the seriousness of the threat he faced.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has now issued a notice to the Punjab government regarding Singh’s petition. The next hearing is scheduled for May 12, 2026, where further developments will unfold.
This troubling sequence of events raises significant concerns about political motivations and public safety for elected officials in India. With heightened scrutiny on governmental decisions regarding security protocols, Harbhajan Singh’s case could set important precedents for others in similar positions.
